If you have any feedback on how we can make our new website better please do contact us and we would like to hear from you. 

Western Civilization:  Chapter 18  Section 1

 

The French Revolution and Napoleon, 1789-1815

 

The French Revolution Begins

 

Main idea:  Economic and Social inequalities in the Old Regime helped cause the French Revolution.

 

Why it Matters Now

Essential Question:  How do economic and social inequalities lead peoples to revolt against their governments?

 

Terms and Names:

 

Old Regime – The old leadership divided the people into three large social classes called estates.

 

Estate – The three social classes in France in the 1770’s

 

Louis XIV – The King of France who had extravagant spending habits.

 

Marie Antoinette – She was Queen and married to Louis XIV.  She also had extravagant spending habits.

 

Estates-General – an assembly of representatives from all three estates.

 

National Assembly – a French Congress established by representatives of the Third Estate on June 17, 1789, to enact laws and reforms in the name of the French People.

 

Tennis Court Oath – a pledge made by the members of France’s national assembly I 1789, in which they vowed to continue meeting until they had drawn up a new constitution.

 

Great Fear – a wave of senseless panic that spread through the French countryside after the storming of the Bastille in 1789.

 

Select one of the causes you listed and explain how it contributed to the French Revolution.

 

_____________________                                                      _______________________

Causes of the French Rev.

 


                                                   

 

 

____________________                                                        _______________________

Why were members of the Third Estate dissatisfied with the life under the Old

Regime?

  

How did Louis XVI’s weak leadership contribute to the growing crisis in France?

  

How did the purpose of the meeting of the Estates-General in 1789 change?

  

History of the phrase “Let them eat cake”.

 

 Chapter 18       Section 2

Revolution Brings Reform and Terror

 

Main Idea:  The revolutionary government of France made reforms but also used terror and violence to retain power.

 

Why it Matters Now: Some governments that lack the support of the majority of their people still use fear to control their citizens.

 

Terms and Names:

 

Legislative Assembly –  French congress with the power to create laws and approve declarations of war, established by the Constitution.

 

Émigré – a person who leaves their native country for political reasons, like the nobles and others who fled France during the French Revolution.

 

Sans-coulottes –  in the French Revolution, a radical group made of  Parisian wage-earners and small shopkeepers who wanted a greater voice in government, lower prices, and an end to food shortages.

 

Jacobin – a radical political organization that called for the death of anyone who chose to support the king.

 

Guillotine – a machine for beheading people, used as a means of execution during the French Revolution.

 

Maximilien Robespierre – a Jacobin leader who slowly gained power in the early months of the year 1793.  His supporters set out to build “a Republic of Virtue” by wiping out every trace of France’s past.  They changed the calendar and wiped out all Sundays because they believed that religion was old-fashioned and dangerous.  They closed all the churches in Paris and soon others towns did the same.

 

 

Reign of Terror – In 1793, Robespierre became the Leader of Public Safety and fir the next year, governed France as a dictatorship.  The period in France when he ruled was called “The Reign of Terror”.

 

Classwork:

Primary Sources on page 662 with document based question 1-3

 

 

Charting the Revolution:  Flow chart

 


Chapter 18:                        Section 3       Napoleon Forges an Empire

 

Main Idea:  Napoleon Bonaparte, a military genius, seized power in France and made himself emperor.

 

Why it Matters Now:  In times of political turmoil, military dictators often seize control of nations.

 

Terms and names

 

Napoleon Bonaparte – born in 1769 on the Mediterranean island of Corsica.  When he was nine years old, his parents sent him to military school.   In 1785, at 16, he became lieutenant of artillery.  When the Revolution broke out he joined the army of the new government.  In 1796 he was appointed to lead the French army.  In 1799  The Directory had lost control and Napoleon’s friends urged him to seize political power. 

 

Coupd’etat – a sudden seize of power

 

Plebecite – vote of the people

 

Lycees – government-run public schools

 

Concordat – signed an agreement with the pope to have government cooperate with religion

 

Napoleonic Code – comprehensive system of laws.  Considered napoleon’s greatest achievement

 

Battle of Trafalgar- The only battle that napoleon ever lost.  It took place off the southwest coast of Spain.  Britain, under the guide of Horatio Nelson won the sea battle.

 

How did Napoleon become a hero in France?  He drove off the Royalists who attacked the National assembly, and he led his armies to great victory in Italy.

 

What did Napoleon consider his greatest triumph in domestic policy?

The Napoleonic Code

 

How was napoleon able to control the countries neighboring the French Empire?

Puppet rulers and threats of force

 

Chapter 18                  Section 4        Napoleon’s Empire Collapses

 

Main Idea:  Napoleon’s conquests aroused nationalistic feelings across Europe and contributed to his downfall.

 

Why it Matters Now:  In the 1990’s, nationalistic feelings contributed to the breakup of nations such as Yugoslavia.

 

Terms and Names

Blockade- a forcible closing of ports

 

Continental System –policy that wanted to make continental Europe more self-sufficient

 

Guerilla- Spanish peasant fighters

 

Peninsular War-the war located on the Iberian Peninsula

 

Scorched Earth Policy-burning grain fields and slaughtering livestock so as to leave nothing for the enemy to eat

 

Waterloo-a village in Belgium where a significant battle took place between napoleon and the British army

 

Hundred Days-Napoleon’s last bid for power

 

How did Great Britain combat Napoleon’s naval blockade?

Great Britain supported smugglers who broke the blockade of its own – more effective than that of the French.

 

Why did Napoleon have trouble fighting the enemy forces in the Peninsular war?

The Spanish used guerilla tactics, ambushing the French and disappearing.

 

Why has Napoleon’s delay of the retreat from Moscow such a great blunder?

If the retreat had begun in September, the Grand Army might have exited Russia by early winter.

 


Chapter  18            Section 5       The Congress of Vienna

 

Main idea:  After exiling Napoleon, European leaders at the Congress of Vienna tried to restore order and reestablish peace.

 

Why it Matters Now:  International bodies such as the United Nations play an active role in trying to maintain world peace and stability today.

 

Terms and names:

 

Congress of Vienna-A series of meetings in Vienna that were called to set up olicies to achieve the goal of a new European order

 

Klemens von Metternich-Foreign Minister of Austria who distrusted democratic ideals

 

Balance of Power-the ideology that no one country would be a threat to others

 

Legitimacy- agreeing that as many possible of the rulers whom Napoleon had driven from their thrones be restored to power.

 

Holy Alliance-A pledge signed in 1815 by Czar Alexander I, Emperor Francis I of Russia, and King William III of Prussia that pledged to base their relations with other nations on Christian principles in order to combat the forces of a revolution.

 

Concert of Europe-A series of alliances devised by Metternich that ensured that nations would help each other if revolutions broke out

 

Main Ideas

 

What was the overall effect of Metternich’s plan on Europe?

Problems:

  1. Contain France
  2. Establish a government for France

 

Solutions:

1.      Surround France with stronger countries

2.      Restore the French monarchy.  Effort-France remained intact; peace lasted for 40 years.

What were the three points of Metternich’s plan for Europe?

Strengthen France’s neighbors, restore balance of power in Europe, restore Europe’s monarchs to their thrones

 

Why was the Congress of Vienna considered a success?

Because it lasted for 40 years

 

 

Chapter 23                   Section 1                      Notes

 

1914-1918                   The Great War

Section 1                      Marching Toward War

 

Main Idea:  In Europe, military buildup, nationalistic feelings, and rival alliances set the stage for a continental war.

 

Why it Matters Now:

Ethnic conflict in the Balkan region, which helped start the war, continued to erupt in that area in the 1990’s.

 

Terms and Names:

Militarism – The policy of glorifying military power and keeping an army prepared for war.

 

Triple Alliance-Germany, Austria-Hungary, Italy

 

Kaiser Wilhelm II-In 1888 he became the ruler of Germany.

 

Triple Entente-Britain, France, Russia

 

Objectives

*Identify the political and military forces at work in Europe in the late 1800’s.

*List the countries that made up the Triple Alliance and the Triple Entente.

*Summarize the events that set World War I in motion.

 

Rising Tensions in Europe

 

*The Rise of Nationalism, a deep devotion to one’s nation, can serve as a unifying course within a country.  By the turn of the 20th century, a fierce rivalry had developed among Europe’s Great Powers.  Those nations were Germany, Austria-Hungary, Great Britain, Russia, Italy, and France.

 

Austria-Hungary and Russia both tried to dominate in the Balkans, a region in southeast Europe.

 

Imperialism and Militarism – European countries competed for overseas empires, their sense of rivalry and mistrust of each other deepened.  European countries also fought for military dominance, which led to an ongoing arms race.

 

The Armenian Massacre – Between 1915 and 1916, at least 600,000 Armenians died at the hands of the Turks.  They were shot, tortured to death, or starved in concentration camps. Sometimes they were loaded onto barges and then thrown overboard.  The Ottomans tried to justify this genocide by saying the Armenians sided with Russia.  Today, the government of Turkey claims that 3000,000 died in deportation.

 

 

Tangled Alliances

 

Otto von Bismark Forges and Early Pact (1864-1871)

 

Goals:

Isolate France

Formed a Dual Alliance between Germany and Austria-Hungary

In 1881 Italy joined and they formed together the “Triple Alliance”.

 

In 1890 Shifting Alliances Threatened Peace

 

 

Kaiser Wilhelm II 1859-1941

 

Profile:  Wilhelm II was related to two leaders of two nations he would eventually engage in war with.  Wilhelm, George V if Great Britain and Nicholas II of Russia were all cousins.  The Kaiser thought a great deal of himself and his place in history.  He also could be sly and deceitful.

 

In 1890 Kaiser Wilhelm II forced Otto von Bismark to resign from his position as chancellor of Germany.

 

In 1890 Wilhelm let Germany’s treaty with Russia laspse.  Russia responded by forming a defensive military alliance with France in 1892 and 1894.  Such an alliance had been Bismark’s fear.

 

Problem:  War with Russia or France would make Germany an enemy of both thus causing Germany to fight a war on two fronts.  (Eastern and Western Borders.)

 

Wilhelm started an aggressive shipbuilding program in an effort to make Germany’s navy equal to Britain’s navy.

 

Alarmed , Great Britain formed an alliance with France.  It was called the Triple Entente.  It did not bind Britain to fight with  France and Russia, but it did ensure that Britain would not fight against them.

 

By 1907 two rival groups existed in Europe.

 

Triple AllianceGermany, Austria-Hungary, Italy

 

Tripe Entente – Great Britain, France, Russia

 

Crises in the Balkans:

More than two hundred thousands civilians have been killed in Bosnia and Croatia since the beginning of the war. Tens of thousands of women were raped, some of them more than a hundred times, while their sons and husbands were beaten and tortured in concentration camps like Omarska and Manjaca. Millions lost their homes due to a process called "ethnic cleansing."

Refugees lost their homes and belongings and it is difficult for their relatives and loved ones to locate them now. They also rarely have access to computers with modems. Sometimes they live in abandoned railroad wagons, like in Cakovec, Croatia. Therefore there are various services which would convert your e-mail messages to printed or voice mail, try to find your friends and deliver the message. You can try them:

 

Ethnic Cleansing is a process in which advancing army of one ethnic group expels civilians of other ethnic groups from towns and villages it conquers in order to create ethnically pure enclaves for members of their ethnic group. Serbian military commander in Bosnia, a war criminal sought by the War Crimes Tribunal in The Hague, Ratko Mladic, sometimes issued specific orders (.wav file in Serbian, 1'30", 1 MB) to his subordinates to shell a particular village more than others, because there is less Serbs and more Muslims living there. Often, refugees of one ethnic group previously "cleansed" from their homes by other ethnic group are made to live in freshly "cleansed" teritory of that other ethnic group. The vengeance they feel explains some of unusual cruelties this war brought to us. Without possibility to get feedback on their actions from the world outside, their perpetuated hatred serves their leaders purposes by providing reasons for continuation of the war. Click here to see the ethnic map of former Yugoslavia before ethnic cleansing (200+kb). Click here to see the ethnic map of former Yugoslavia today (large graphics, updates monthly, not extremely accurate), after the Dayton agreement. Ethnic Cleansing created more than two million refugees and displaced persons in former Yugoslavia during the war in Bosnia. This number increased with the expulsion of Serbs from Croatia and with the ferocious atrocities committed by Serbs against the Albanian majority in Kosovo, prior and during (in spite of) NATO air strikes.

Although Serbs were by far the most succesful "cleansers," all sides adopted this method in the course of war. Record ethnic cleansing operations were Serbian Operation Horseshoe in Kosov@ and Croatian Operation Storm in Krajina. Bosnian capital Sarajevo, which so far escaped the "cleansing," has been under seige for over 1000 days, with more than 10 000 people killed and 50 000 injured. Check here what various human rights organizations have on the record. At the beginning of 1997 there still are more than 21,000 people in Bosnia missing.
As of May 1, 2005, ten years after the war has ended, total number of persons, for whom International Committee of the Red Cross tracing request was opened by their families, and for which by that date no additional information was received, was 14,444.


Five perfected steps


by Mark Danner

From the well-documented stories of a great many cities and towns and villages, dating back to the cleansing of the Krajina of Croats during 1991 and 1992, one can extract a rough standard operation.

  1. Concentration. Surround the area to be cleansed and after warning the resident Serbs-often they are urged to leave or are at least told to mark their houses with white flags-intimidate the target
  2. Decapitation. Execute political leaders and those capable of taking their places: lawyers, judges, public officials, writers, professors.
  3. Separation. Divide women, children, and old men from men of "fighting age"-sixteen years to sixty years old.
  4. Evacuation. Transport women, children, and old men to the border, expelling them into a neighboring territory or country.
  5. Liquidation. Execute "fighting age" men, dispose of bodies.

Too highly schematic to do justice to the Serbs minute planning-for each town, each village, each situation is different-these five steps nonetheless comprise the elements of the program that worked.

Percentages of Bosnians actually killed varied widely, partly according to the strategic value of the target.


Picture credit: © 1992 Ron Haviv, Saba Press Photos

Bjeljina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, April 1992, victim's perspective: a Serb irregular kicks the body of a Muslim woman executed seconds after coming to the aid of her husband, another victim. During the occupation of Bjeljina, a primarily Muslim town, Muslims were "cleansed" from their homes. The entire photograph (here only the lower half is used) is a part of the TIME-LIFE Faces of Sorrow: Agony in the Former Yugoslavia exhibition. Drawing that covers the photo is from Hermann Dupuis comic book available over the net.

.

 

The Balkan Peninsula, located in the southeastern corner of Europe,  was nicknamed “The Powder Keg of Europe”  It is home to an assortment of ethnic groups.  By the early 1900’s the Ottoman Empire was home to an assortment of ethnic groups.  By the early 1900’s this region was in decline.  New nations were formed including; Bulgaria, Greece, Montenegro, Romania and Serbia.

 

Austria-Hungrary had a much different feeling than the Russians about this region. 

Austria annexed (took in) Bosnia and Herzogovina.  The Serbs were in a constant battle to take these regions back from Austria.

 



 Genocide Memorials

 Photo Collections

 Sample Documents

 Genocide Map

 Genocide FAQ

 Encyclopedia
 Entries

 Chronology

 

 Background
 Reading

 Related
 Organizations



America and the Armenian Genocide of 1915

 

Armenian Genocide


In April 1915 the Ottoman government embarked upon the systematic decimation of its civilian Armenian population. The persecutions continued with varying intensity until 1923 when the Ottoman Empire ceased to exist and was replaced by the Republic of Turkey. The Armenian population of the Ottoman state was reported at about two million in 1915. An estimated one million had perished by 1918, while hundreds of thousands had become homeless and stateless refugees. By 1923 virtually the entire Armenian population of Anatolian Turkey had disappeared.

The Ottoman Empire was ruled by the Turks who had conquered lands extending across West Asia, North Africa and Southeast Europe. The Ottoman government was centered in Istanbul (Constantinople) and was headed by a sultan who was vested with absolute power. The Turks practiced Islam and were a martial people. The Armenians, a Christian minority, lived as second class citizens subject to legal restrictions which denied them normal safeguards. Neither their lives nor their properties were guaranteed security. As non-Muslims they were also obligated to pay discriminatory taxes and denied participation in government. Scattered across the empire, the status of the Armenians was further complicated by the fact that the territory of historic Armenia was divided between the Ottomans and the Russians.

In its heyday in the sixteenth century, the Ottoman Empire was a powerful state. Its minority populations prospered with the growth of its economy. By the nineteenth century, the empire was in serious decline. It had been reduced in size and by 1914 had lost virtually all its lands in Europe and Africa. This decline created enormous internal political and economic pressures which contributed to the intensification of ethnic tensions. Armenian aspirations for representation and participation in government aroused suspicions among the Muslim Turks who had never shared power in their country with any minority and who also saw nationalist movements in the Balkans result in the secession of former Ottoman territories. Demands by Armenian political organizations for administrative reforms in the Armenian-inhabited provinces and better police protection from predatory tribes among the Kurds only invited further repression. The government was determined to avoid resolving the so-called Armenian Question in any way that altered the traditional system of administration. During the reign of the Sultan Abdul Hamid (Abdulhamit) II (1876-1909), a series of massacres throughout the empire meant to frighten Armenians and so dampen their expectations, cost up to three hundred thousand lives by some estimates and inflicted enormous material losses on a majority of Armenians.

In response to the crisis in the Ottoman Empire, a new political group called the Young Turks seized power by revolution in 1908. From the Young Turks, the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), Ittihad ve Terakki Jemiyeti, emerged at the head of the government in a coup staged in 1913. It was led by a triumvirate: Enver, Minister of War; Talaat, Minister of the Interior (Grand Vizier in 1917); and Jemal, Minister of the Marine. The CUP espoused an ultranationalistic ideology which advocated the formation of an exclusively Turkish state. It also subscribed to an ideology of aggrandizement through conquest directed eastward toward other regions inhabited by Turkic peoples, at that time subject to the Russian Empire. The CUP also steered Istanbul toward closer diplomatic and military relations with Imperial Germany. When World War I broke out in August 1914, the Ottoman Empire formed part of the Triple Alliance with the other Central Powers, Germany and Austria-Hungary, and it declared war on Russia and its Western allies, Great Britain and France.

The Ottoman armies initially suffered a string of defeats which they made up with a series of easy military victories in the Caucasus in 1918 before the Central Powers capitulated later that same year. Whether retreating or advancing, the Ottoman army used the occasion of war to wage a collateral campaign of massacre against the civilian Armenian population in the regions in which warfare was being conducted. These measures were part of the genocidal program secretly adopted by the CUP and implemented under the cover of war. They coincided with the CUP's larger program to eradicate the Armenians from Turkey and neighboring countries for the purpose of creating a new Pan-Turanian empire. Through the spring and summer of 1915, in all areas outside the war zones, the Armenian population was ordered deported from their homes. Convoys consisting of tens of thousands including men, women, and children were driven hundreds of miles toward the Syrian desert.

The deportations were disguised as a resettlement program. The brutal treatment of the deportees, most of whom were made to walk to their destinations, made it apparent that the deportations were mainly intended as death marches. Moreover, the policy of deportation surgically removed the Armenians from the rest of society and disposed of great masses of people with little or no destruction of property. The displacement process, therefore, also served as a major opportunity orchestrated by the CUP for the plundering of the material wealth of the Armenians and proved an effortless method of expropriating all of their immovable properties.

The genocidal intent of the CUP measures was also evidenced by the mass killings that accompanied the deportations. Earlier, Armenian soldiers in the Ottoman forces had been disarmed and either worked to death in labor battalions or outright executed in small batches. With the elimination of the able-bodied men from the Armenian population, the deportations proceeded with little resistance. The convoys were frequently attacked by bands of killers specifically organized for the purpose of slaughtering the Armenians. As its instrument of extermination, the government had authorized the formation of gangs of butchers—mostly convicts released from prison expressly enlisted in the units of the so-called Special Organization, Teshkilâti Mahsusa. This secret outfit was headed by the most ferocious partisans of the CUP who took it upon themselves to carry out the orders of the central government with the covert instructions of their party leaders. A sizable portion of the deportees, including women and children, were indisciminately killed in massacres along the deportation routes. The cruelty characterizing the killing process was heightened by the fact that it was frequently carried out by the sword in terrifying episodes of bloodshed. Furthermore, for the survivors, their witnessing of the murder of friends and relatives with the mass of innocent persons was the source of serious trauma. Many younger women and some orphaned children were also abducted and placed in bondage in Turkish and Muslim homes resulting in another type of trauma characterized by the shock of losing both family and one's sense of identity. These women and children were frequently forbidden to grieve, were employed as unpaid laborers, and were required to assimilate the language and religion of their captors.

The government had made no provisions for the feeding of the deported population. Starvation took an enormous toll much as exhaustion felled the elderly, the weaker and the infirm. Deportees were denied food and water in a deliberate effort to hasten death. The survivors who reached northern Syria were collected at a number of concentration camps whence they were sent further south to die under the scorching sun of the desert. Through methodically organized deportation, systematic massacre, deliberate starvation and dehydration, and continuous brutalization, the Ottoman government reduced its Armenian population to a frightened mass of famished individuals whose families and communities had been destroyed in a single stroke.

Resistance to the deportations was infrequent. Only in one instance did the entire population of an Armenian settlement manage to evade death. The mountaineers of Musa Dagh defended themselves in the heights above their villages until French naval vessels in the eastern Mediterranean detected them and transported them to safety. The inhabitants of the city of Van in eastern Armenia defended themselves until relieved by advancing Russian forces. They abandoned the city in May 1915, a month after the siege was lifted, when the Russian Army withdrew. The fleeing population was hunted down mercilessly by Turkish irregular forces. Inland towns that resisted, such as Urfa (Edessa), were reduced to rubble by artillery. The survival of the Armenians in large part is credited not to acts of resistance, but to the humanitarian intervention led by American Ambassador Henry Morgenthau. Although the Allied Powers expressly warned the Ottoman government about its policy of genocide, ultimately it was through Morgenthau's efforts that the plight of the Armenians was publicized in the United States. The U.S. Congress authorized the formation of a relief committee which raised funds to feed "the starving Armenians." Near East Relief, as the committee was eventually known, saved tens of thousands of lives. After the war, it headed a large-scale effort to rehabilitate the survivors who were mostly left to their own devices in their places of deportation. By setting up refugee camps, orphanages, medical clinics and educational facilities, Near East Relief rescued the surviving Armenian population.

In the post-war period nearly four hundred of the key CUP officials implicated in the atrocities committed against the Armenians were arrested. A number of domestic military tribunals were convened which brought charges ranging from the unconstitutional seizure of power and subversion of the legal government, the conduct of a war of aggression, and conspiring the liquidation of the Armenian population, to more explicit capital crimes, including massacre. Some of the accused were found guilty of the charges. Most significantly, the ruling triumvirate was condemned to death. They, however, eluded justice by fleeing abroad. Their escape left the matter of avenging the countless victims to a clandestine group of survivors that tracked down the CUP arch conspirators. Talaat, the principal architect of the Armenian genocide, was killed in 1921 in Berlin where he had gone into hiding. His assassin was arrested and tried in a German court which acquitted him.

Most of those implicated in war crimes evaded justice and many joined the new Nationalist Turkish movement led by Mustafa Kemal. In a series of military campaigns against Russian Armenia in 1920, against the refugee Armenians who had returned to Cilicia in southern Turkey in 1921, and against the Greek army that had occupied Izmir (Smyrna) where the last intact Armenian community in Anatolia still existed in 1922, the Nationalist forces completed the process of eradicating the Armenians through further expulsions and massacres. When Turkey was declared a republic in 1923 and received international recognition, the Armenian Question and all related matters of resettlement and restitution were swept aside and soon forgotten.

In all, it is estimated that up to a million and a half Armenians perished at the hands of Ottoman and Turkish military and paramilitary forces and through atrocities intentionally inflicted to eliminate the Armenian demographic presence in Turkey. In the process, the population of historic Armenia at the eastern extremity of Anatolia was wiped off the map. With their disappearance, an ancient people which had inhabited the Armenian highlands for three thousand years lost its historic homeland and was forced into exile and a new diaspora. The surviving refugees spread around the world and eventually settled in some two dozen countries on all continents of the globe. Triumphant in its total annihilation of the Armenians and relieved of any obligations to the victims and survivors, the Turkish Republic adopted a policy of dismissing the charge of genocide and denying that the deportations and atrocities had constituted part of a deliberate plan to exterminate the Armenians. When the Red Army sovietized what remained of Russian Armenia in 1920, the Armenians had been compressed into an area amounting to no more than ten percent of the territories of their historic homeland. Armenians annually commemorate the Genocide on April 24 at the site of memorials raised by the survivors in all their communities around the world.

—Rouben Paul Adalian

 

 

 

 


 

 

Armenian National Institute
1334 G Street, NW Suite 200
Washington, DC 20005

 

 

tel: (202) 383-9009        e-mail: ani@agmm.org

 

 

Copyright © 1998-2010 Armenian National Institute. Read copyright notice and disclaimer.

 

 

 

A Shot Heard Round the World

 

Archduke Franz Ferdinand, and his wife, Sophie.  On June 28, 1914 the couple paid a state visit to Sarejavo, the capital of Bosnia.  As they road thtough the streets of Sarejevo they were shot point blank by a member of the Serbian Black hand, a secret society whose goal was to rid Bosnia of Austrian rule.

 

Austria used this event to make demand in Serbia. Russia mobilized its forces on the Austrian border. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
































































































































































































































 

 
Texts Used:
World History Patterns of Interaction, McDougal Littell
American Government, William A. McClenaghan
  Site Map